Understanding The RAFT Protocol for Distributed Systems

Consistent and reliable operation across a network of interconnected computers presents a unique challenge. This is where consensus algorithms come into play, serving as the backbone for achieving uniformity and dependability in these complex environments. The journey from the inception of these algorithms to the development of RAFT offers a fascinating glimpse into the evolution of distributed computing.

The Need for Consensus in Distributed Systems

Distributed systems consist of multiple nodes (computers or servers) that work together to perform tasks. These systems are designed to be fault-tolerant, meaning they continue to operate effectively even if some nodes fail. However, for the system to function correctly, all nodes must agree on certain decisions, like the state of a database or the order of transactions in a log. This agreement is crucial in scenarios like financial transactions, where consistency and accuracy are paramount. Consensus algorithms are thus essential in ensuring that all nodes in a distributed system agree on a single source of truth, despite potential failures or network issues.

Early Consensus Protocols

One of the earliest and most influential consensus algorithms is Paxos, developed by Leslie Lamport in the late 1980s. Paxos was designed to handle the problem of reaching a consensus in a network where nodes might fail or communication might be unreliable. It ensures that a cluster of nodes can agree on a single value or sequence of values, which is key in maintaining the consistency of replicated data.

Paxos: Complex but Robust

Paxos involves roles like proposers, acceptors, and learners, each playing a part in the consensus process. Proposers suggest values, acceptors vote on these proposals, and learners are informed about the consensus. Paxos can handle node failures and network partitions, making it robust and reliable. However, Paxos is notoriously complex. Its intricate workings and the abstract nature of its original descriptions have made it difficult for practitioners to grasp and implement effectively. This complexity spurred the search for more understandable and accessible consensus algorithms.

The Genesis of RAFT

Enter RAFT (Reliable, Replicated, Redundant, And Fault-Tolerant), a consensus algorithm designed by Diego Ongaro and John Ousterhout from Stanford University. Introduced in 2013, RAFT was developed as a more understandable alternative to Paxos. The creators of RAFT aimed to simplify the consensus process, making it easier for developers and system architects to grasp and implement.

RAFT: Prioritizing Understandability and Efficiency

RAFT breaks down the consensus problem into three subproblems: leader election, log replication, and safety. This modular approach makes RAFT more comprehensible than Paxos. In RAFT, the nodes in a distributed system are divided into leaders, followers, and candidates. The protocol ensures a more straightforward leader election process, where one node becomes the leader, managing and coordinating the updates across the system. This clarity in roles simplifies many aspects of the consensus process.

Moreover, RAFT includes explicit mechanisms for log replication, a key aspect of maintaining a consistent state across distributed systems. The safety measures in RAFT ensure that the system remains consistent and that once a decision is made, it is irreversible, even if some nodes fail or there are network issues.

Core Concepts of RAFT

RAFT simplifies consensus by breaking down the process into three key elements: Leader Election, Log Replication, and Safety.

1. Leader Election

In RAFT, one node is elected as the ‘Leader,’ while others are ‘Followers.’ The leader manages all log entries and coordinates updates. If the leader fails, a new leader is elected. This process starts with a ‘term,’ a period during which a leader is elected. Each node starts as a follower. If a follower receives no communication from a leader, it becomes a candidate and initiates an election by incrementing its term and requesting votes from other nodes. The candidate receiving a majority of votes becomes the new leader.

2. Log Replication

Once a leader is elected, it begins log replication. The leader takes client requests, appends them to its log, and replicates these entries across follower nodes. Followers then append these entries to their logs. This ensures all nodes maintain identical copies of the log, achieving consistency across the distributed system.

3. Safety

RAFT ensures safety through its commitment rules. A log entry is committed once the majority of nodes have written it to their logs. Only committed entries are applied to the state machines of the nodes, ensuring all nodes reflect the same system state.

How RAFT Works: A Step-by-Step Overview

1. Leader Election

• Timeouts and Heartbeats: Each follower node has a random election timeout. If a follower doesn’t hear from the leader within this timeout, it assumes there’s no active leader and starts a new election.
• Candidate State: A follower becomes a candidate, increments its term, and votes for itself. It then sends a request for votes to other nodes.
• Majority Vote: To be elected leader, a candidate must receive votes from a majority of the nodes in the cluster.
• Term Validation: A node won’t vote for a candidate if the candidate’s term is older than its current term.

2. Log Replication

• Client Requests: The leader receives client requests, which are log entries that need to be replicated and executed.
• Log Entries: Each log entry contains a command and the term number when the entry was received by the leader.
• Replication Process: The leader appends the entry to its log and sends AppendEntries RPCs to each of the follower nodes to replicate the entry.
• Consistency Check: Before replicating new entries, the leader checks if followers’ logs are consistent with its own and resolves any discrepancies.

3. Safety and Consistency

• Committing Entries: An entry is considered committed when it’s stored on a majority of servers. The leader then notifies followers of committed entries in subsequent AppendEntries RPCs.
• Applying to State Machine: Once an entry is committed, it can be safely applied to the state machine.

4. Handling Failures and Network Partitions

• Leader Crash: If a leader crashes, followers will time out and start a new election.
• Network Partition: In case of a partition, each partition may elect its own leader, but only the leader in the majority partition can commit entries.

5. Log Matching Property

• Index and Term Matching: RAFT ensures that if two logs contain an entry with the same index and term, then the logs are identical in all entries up through the given index.
• Log Prefix Property: This property ensures that if a leader’s log and a follower’s log match at any index, they are guaranteed to be identical in all preceding entries.

Additional Aspects

Cluster Membership Changes

RAFT also supports dynamic changes in the cluster configuration (like adding or removing nodes) using a two-phase approach to ensure consistency and avoid split-brain scenarios.

Snapshotting

For long-running systems, log entries can grow indefinitely. RAFT incorporates snapshotting, where the current state is saved and the log is compacted to reduce storage requirements and speed up recovery.

Client Interaction

Clients typically communicate with the RAFT cluster through the leader. If a client connects to a follower, the follower redirects the client to the leader.

Implementations and Practical Considerations

• Timeouts and Performance: The election timeout is crucial for RAFT’s performance and reliability. It must be configured to balance between quick recovery from leader failures and minimizing unnecessary elections.
• Scalability: While RAFT works well for small to medium-sized clusters, its performance can degrade as the cluster size increases, primarily due to the overhead of log replication and heartbeats.

Industry Adoption

RAFT, with its emphasis on simplicity and understandability, has been widely adopted in various software solutions, particularly those requiring reliable distributed coordination and consensus. Here are some notable examples:

1. etcd: Developed by CoreOS, etcd is a key-value store used for shared configuration and service discovery in distributed systems. It’s a critical component in Kubernetes for storing and replicating Kubernetes cluster state.
2. Consul: Created by HashiCorp, Consul is a service networking solution that provides service discovery, health checking, and a distributed configuration. RAFT is used in Consul for its internal consensus and state replication mechanisms.
3. CockroachDB: This is a cloud-native, distributed SQL database designed for scalability and resilience. CockroachDB uses RAFT for replicating data across nodes to ensure consistency and fault tolerance.
4. RethinkDB: An open-source database for real-time web applications, RethinkDB uses RAFT for cluster coordination and consistency. It’s known for its real-time push architectures.
5. Apache Ratis: Part of the Apache Software Foundation, Ratis is a Java library that provides a RAFT protocol implementation. It’s used as the consensus module in projects like Apache Ozone, an object store for Hadoop.
6. TiDB: An open-source, distributed SQL database, TiDB uses RAFT for data replication. It offers MySQL compatibility, focusing on horizontal scalability, strong consistency, and high availability.
7. LogDevice: Developed by Facebook, LogDevice is a distributed data store for logs, which uses RAFT for managing metadata replication and consistency.
8. InfluxDB: A time-series database, InfluxDB uses RAFT for metadata management across its distributed clusters.
9. HashiCorp Vault: A tool for secrets management, Vault uses RAFT for its internal data storage and replication, ensuring secure storage and access to sensitive data across distributed systems.
10. MinIO: An open-source high-performance object storage service, MinIO uses RAFT for metadata management and consensus in its distributed mode.

These examples highlight the diverse applications of RAFT in real-world scenarios, from databases and cloud services to configuration management and data storage solutions.

🚀 Explore a Wealth of Resources in Software Development and More by Luis Soares

📚 Learning Hub: Expand your knowledge in various tech domains, including Rust, Software Development, Cloud Computing, Cyber Security, Blockchain, and Linux, through my extensive resource collection:

• Hands-On Tutorials with GitHub Repos: Gain practical skills across different technologies with step-by-step tutorials, complemented by dedicated GitHub repositories. Access Tutorials
• In-Depth Guides & Articles: Deep dive into core concepts of Rust, Software Development, Cloud Computing, and more, with detailed guides and articles filled with practical examples. Read More
• E-Books Collection: Enhance your understanding of various tech fields with a series of free e-Books, including titles like “Mastering Rust Ownership” and “Application Security Guide” Download eBook
• Project Showcases: Discover a range of fully functional projects across different domains, such as an API Gateway, Blockchain Network, Cyber Security Tools, Cloud Services, and more. View Projects
• LinkedIn Newsletter: Stay ahead in the fast-evolving tech landscape with regular updates and insights on Rust, Software Development, and emerging technologies by subscribing to my newsletter on LinkedIn. Subscribe Here

🔗 Connect with Me:

• Medium: Read my articles on Medium and give claps if you find them helpful. It motivates me to keep writing and sharing Rust content. Follow on Medium
• Personal Blog: Discover more on my personal blog, a hub for all my Rust-related content. Visit Blog
• LinkedIn: Join my professional network for more insightful discussions and updates. Connect on LinkedIn
• Twitter: Follow me on Twitter for quick updates and thoughts on Rust programming. Follow on Twitter

Wanna talk? Leave a comment or drop me a message!

All the best,

Luis Soares

Senior Software Engineer | Cloud Engineer | SRE | Tech Lead | Rust | Golang | Java | ML AI & Statistics | Web3 & Blockchain